Alicia Berenson has not uttered a word
since she allegedly killed her husband. That has to mean she is guilty, right?
Who wouldn’t defend themselves if they were innocent? But why would she do it?
She is a successful painter married to an also successful fashion photographer
and by all accounts they seemed happy and in love.
Theo Faber, a psychotherapist, has decided
to make it his life’s mission to get her to talk. But to do this he needs to
get a position at the institute she is in and somehow make her trust him enough
to open up. After being accepted at the Grove, Theo starts to do his own
investigations into what happened and finds something out that he thinks the
police might have missed. She may have been stalked just before the murder.
So… I was pulled in by the hype and the
promise of a blow-your-mind thriller. It started off well and got me thinking,
but then it got to the point where stopping to think or question something made
me annoyed because it pulled me out of the reading. And it was happening far too
often.
You have the story told via Alicia’s diary
entries (very odd entries as she records conversations word for word and in
direct speech, and even when she thinks her house is being broken into, she is
still filling in her diary) and Theo’s experiences. This supposedly adds to the
teaser on the way to the twist but so much doesn’t actually align.
Then in the story you have psychiatrists
changing meds randomly without a withdrawal process, no real policies and
procedures regarding patient care, dodgy medication sales that barely get
attention, mental disorders being called illnesses, and medical staff calling
patients “bitches” and “crazy”.
There are loads of little sub-plots meant
to direct you in certain ways but they become irritating when they don’t get
finished. And then simple things like “action sequences” where someone gets hit
over the head with a baseball bat and suffers no injuries or someone gets
injected with enough meds to drop a rhino but still finishes managing to write
an incriminating document. Just no.
I did not like the stereotyping throughout,
not only of appearances, but also personality traits.
I do love a good psychological thriller and
this was definitely not one of those. Closer to the middle the answer is
obvious and I found the tie in connection to the painting very, very thin. The
reason she was silent is just not believable and when you turn the last page
you are left wanting.
No comments:
Post a Comment